This page was created in 2004 to address issues arising at
that time.
There have been some updates since.
THE STUCKIST STELLA VINE
"When
you experience work, you gradually in your life, you realise what
you're
sort of allowed to do because you've seen someone else do it."
- Stella Vine
Stella Vine 2007 - Sebastian
Sharples
|
"Stella Vine...was a protégée of the
Stuckist movement" - Independent on Sunday article
here
"Stella Vine...began painting...as member of the
Stuckists" - The Guardian
"Stuckism... discovered her" - The Times
I used to read English
news papers and first saw Stella Vine at The Saatchi gallery...
then, when I saw the Stuckists' paintings, I thought: "oh, they're
painting like Stella Vine!"
I didn't know that she was married to Mr Thomson and was inspired
by the 'Stuckist School'.
Elaine K. Bond on Daniel North blog (12.1.07)
Stella Vine and her paintings of Princess Diana
(Hi Paul Can You Come Over) and of Rachael Whitear, both
purchased and exhibited by Charles Saatchi in 2004, received worldwide
media coverage. Saatchi's media power promoted her as his 'discovery'.
In fact she had been 'discovered' and her work considerably
influenced by the Stuckists three years before this date. She
went to a talk by Billy Childish and Charles Thomson on Stuckism
in June 2000. From May to November 2001, she participated in the
Stuckists: her work was exhibited for the first time, both in
this country and abroad, in Stuckist shows; she took part in a
Stuckist demonstration; she aided the Stuckist work in the General
Election; she founded a Stuckist group.
It should be noted that the intent of this page is not to
undermine Stella Vine's work (and we do not consider that it does)
but to record accurately a part of her history which she has not
acknowledged, and to give due credit to people who helped and
influenced her at a critical early stage in her artistic development.
THIS PAGE
The background to Stella Vine's Princess Diana painting
The two major influences on her work
The continuing influence (in her
show Prozac and Private Views)
The example of other Stuckists
Update 2005
How her work was transformed through Stuckism
The truth behind these media statements
"She had never sold a painting before"
"Nobody liked what she was doing or
believed in her"
"She didn't agree with Stuckist
views"
"She had no training apart from some
part-time local classes"
OTHER PAGES
Charles Saatchi the Stuckist
Stella Vine Gets Married (Evening Standard)
Billy Childish | Rivington Gallery
Additional material on the gossip page - including the disappearing blog spot
PHOTOS
Stella Vine meets (and
joins) the Stuckists
Stella Vine marriage/Charles
Thomson/Billy Childish
Trafalgar Square demo attended by Stella Vine
EXTERNAL LINKS
Arty interview with Stella Vine
|
Cathy Lomax blogspot | Transition Gallery | Saatchi Gallery
STATEMENT
BY CHARLES THOMSON, CO-FOUNDER OF THE
STUCKISTS
(and ex-husband of Stella
Vine)
Stella's work changed virtually overnight when she was
introduced to the Stuckist
way of art. She is now being promoted by Charles
Saatchi as a stand-alone (and
his discovery) without any acknowledgement about the
origin of her style and ideas.
When people later see Stuckist work - and we have a
major show at the Walker and
Lady Lever Galleries for the Liverpool Biennial in
September this year - I am
seriously concerned that the response will be
"it's like Stella Vine's work".
This is exactly what has already happened as regards
Tracey Emin and Billy Childish.
Stella's work - which I should point out I admire (and
strongly encouraged) -
still bears its Stuckist influences so visibly that I
consider it a serious threat
that our artistic and philosophical identity could be
hijacked under our very
noses.
This would compromise not only my position but that of
a number of artists whose
work over the last 25 years has resulted in the
artistic approach that was imparted
freely to Stella in order to stimulate her creativity
when she joined the Stuckists
in 2001.
Ann Bukantas, the Curator of Fine Art at the Walker Gallery
identified Stella Vine's painting of Princess Diana
Hi Paul Can You Come Over as a Stuckist painting as soon as
she saw the image in the press, and commented,
"It jumps off the page at you as that."
She was very familiar with the range
of Stuckist work from preparing at that time for The
Stuckists Punk Victorian show
at the Walker during the 2004 Liverpool Biennial.
|
BACKGROUND
TO THE PAINTINGS
The two major influences
on Stella Vine's
painting
|
|
| | | | |
Hi
Paul Can You Come Over by Stella Vine
|
Billy and
Traci by Billy Childish (owned by Stella
Vine) |
The
Drinker by Billy
Childish |
Sir Nicholas
Serota Makes an Acquisitions Decision by
Charles Thomson |
Why Doesn't
MrRichards Seduce Me by Charles
Thomson |
Stella
Vine, Charles Thomson, Billy Childish outside
Childish's house in Chatham, August
2001 |
Two major influences
Hi Paul Can You Come Over by Stella Vine is a
synthesis of her two major influences,
Billy Childish and Charles Thomson, through whom she
has fused her own means of
expression. Billy
Childish Childish was the model and
inspiration for her to take up painting
in the first place. She felt so ardently about his
output that she bought two
paintings in 1991, even though she was barely scraping
by financially. His seemingly
chaotic and urgent brushwork was the starting point
for how she applies paint
and the connection is still obvious. The colour range
is also comparable, as is
the frequent darkness of subject matter with haunted
isolated faces. Even
his speed has been taken on - both artists have
remarkably succeeded in finishing
some works in fifteen minutes (the time Hi Paul
took). Childish's explanation
for this is that is releases unconscious
material. Charles
Thomson From Charles Thomson came ideas.
Sir Nicholas Serota Makes
an Acquisitions Decision is already a well-known
painting. Vine was certainly
familiar with this and its media profile, having been
shown the press cuttings
in which it appeared by Thomson
himself. The
poweful appeal of a public figure's private thoughts
expressed on canvas has not
escaped her, whether this was a conscious or merely
unconsciously assimilated
model. The closeness
of her thinking to his is apparent from earlier works
by Thomson. Compositionally
Hey Paul is a mirror image of Thomson's Why
Doesn't Mr Richards Seduce
Me. The theme of the isolated woman yearning for
male company is identical
too. Stella
Vine Vine's twist is the particular woman
chosen and her own memorable
text - and the fact that she made a composite of
influences from Childish and
Thomson. School
of Stuckism There is a 'school of Stuckism' to
which Vine belongs regardless
of any formal affiliation (which she no longer has -
nor, for that matter does
Childish, a co-founder of the movement with
Thomson). Ann
Bukantas, Fine Art Curator, the Walker,
Liverpool So apparent is this
that the painting was recognised as Stuckist on first
sight by Ann Bukantas, the
Fine Art Curator of the Walker Gallery, Liverpool. She
is currently curating a
show of Stuckist work for September's Liverpool
Biennial, so is highly aware of
the qualities that permeate Stuckist work. She
commented, "it just jumps
off the page as that." The
continuing influence
|
| | |
Transcriptions
of Gainsborough Charles Thomson painted a
transcription of Gainsborough's
The Hon. Frances Duncombe in 1999. Stella Vine
was given a reproduction
of this in 2001. Now she has produced her own
transcription of Gainsborough's
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, choosing the
same three-quarter length
pose and a virtually identical (but mirror image)
composition . She was present
in Thomson's studio in 2001 while he was working on
Gainsborough transcriptions,
which were bought by Deutsche Bank soon after.
. |
Mrs
Siddons (after Gainsborough) by Charles
Thomson 2002 |
Frances Duncombe
(after Gainsborough) by Charles Thomson 1999
|
Georgiana
(after Gainsborough) by Stella Vine 2004
|
Thomson's
comment on Gainsborough: "They are...
psychological depictions...I wondered
what was beneath the façade" (2003, statement for
Deutsche Bank); Vine's:"
you can see the character beneath the beauty, he was
trying to say something"
(2004, Arty 15) Prozac
and Private Views Stuckism was launched in the
national media in 1999
with the Gainsborough transcription by Charles Thomson
The Hon. Frances Duncombe
reproduced on the cover of the Sunday
Times Culture supplement (which Stella Vine was
given a copy of). The key
image on the Transition
Gallery website promoting Vine's solo show
Prozac and Private Views
(10 June - 4 July 2004) is now her transcription of
Gainsborough's Georgiana.
Gainsborough's
image of remote and superficial Eighteenth Century
high society makes him an unlikely
choice of artist for a contemporary practitioner.
However, attention was drawn
to other aspects of him in the Stuckist manifesto
Handy
Hints (Childish/Thomson 11.4.00), Appendix
(iii), Recommended Study:
Thomas Gainsborough 1727 - 1788 He started
off painting quite badly,
he painted in his own way, his own style and
technique. Gainsborough pioneered
landscape painting by painting landscapes when it was
completely unfashionable
and nobody bought them. An Influence on
Turner.
Thomson
has painted six Gainsborough transcriptions (five of
which are on pages here
and here) and over made
over forty transcription drawings. The
example of other Stuckists
| | | | | |
Lucy
by Stella Vine 2004 | Two
Dogs (detail) by Wolf Howard 2001
|
I
Will Always Love You (detail) by Stella Vine
2004 |
Until the
Last Dog Is Hung (detail) by Joe Machine
2001 |
Two Dogs
Fighting (detail) by Wolf Howard 2004
|
| | | | | | | |
Catherine
[Deneuve] by Stella Vine 2004 | Diana
Dors with a Machine Gun (detail) by Joe
Machine 2001 | Diana
Dors with an Axe (detail) by Joe Machine
2000 | My
Grandfather Will Fight You (detail) by Joe
Machine 2001 | Sailor
on a Sea of Sex (detail) by Joe Machine
1999 | Until
the Last Dog Is Hung (detail) by Joe Machine
2001 |
Wolf Howard Stella Vine exhibited and
invigilated at the Vote Stuckist
show in Brixton in 2001 at a crucial stage in her
development. It was her introduction
to a group of visual artists, and had a galvanising
effect on her. Ideas and images
not present in her work before that time have
continued to emerge since, and in
her first solo show of work Prozac and Private Views
(Transition Gallery, June
2004). Cats and
dogs are normally considered twee subjects, but Wolf
Howard showed how they could
be painted with conviction and insight, showing
humour, sensitivity and pathos.
The detail from his Two Dogs shows a clear precedent
for Vine's Lucy with its
strong black face and doleful eyes depicted full on.
Howard three years later
has painted an angry aggressive dog, and Vine, quite
independently, has followed
a parallel course as seen in I Will Always Love You.
Joe
Machine Also exhibited in the Vote Stuckist
show was Joe Machine's Until
the Last Dog is Hung. The dog with bloody bared teeth
has reappeared in Vine's
I Will Always Love You. Even
more remarkable from the same Machine painting is the
dead dog. It has blood running
from its mouth, a detail not seen in Vine's work at
the time, but now her 'trademark'
from her paintng of Princess Diana onwards. Blood was
something of a trademark
for Machine for years before as is evident in the
other details above.
He also
demonstrated the viability of
recycling iconic blonde movie
stars and that there was artistic
life for them beyond Warhol.
His choice was Diana Dors. Some
years later, Vine settled on
Catherine Deneuve.
Update
2005
Mark
D, was somewhat taken aback by the
striking similarity between
his painting of Billy Childish (far
left) and one by Stella
Vine of Princess Diana which
appeared several weeks later (near
left). Last year Mark D attemped to
buy a painting from her
and was told to "go fuck
yourself". Read about it
here. Mark
D is a collector and also a guest
artist whose work appears
on this site.
|
back
to top |
The
transformation of Stella Vine's
art |
| | |
|
| |
Stella
Vine with her work in Vote Stuckist show, Fridge
Gallery, Brixton, June 2001:
portrait heads from Hampstead School of
Art |
Doodle
by Stella Vine in Charles Thomson's notebook, circa
June 2001: strippers and punters |
Drawing
by Charles Thomson of Stella Vine drawing, 5 July
2001. She is drawng a strip
club scene. | Drawing
by Charles Thomson of Stella Vine drawing, 15 July
2001. She is drawing a
stripper and a masturbating priest.
| Drawing
by Charles Thomson of Stella Vine drawing, 15 July
2001. She is drawing Billy
Childish performing (from memory) | Stripper
by Charles Thomson, January 2002, based on a painting
by Stella Vine, July 2001 |
Hampstead School of Art
The photo shows Stella Vine with her first ever
exhibited paintings as part of
the Vote Stuckist show in 2001. These are the
paintings from her Hampstead School
of Art classes. There is straightforward subject
matter of portrait heads and
a life model. Childish's influence is apparent in the
self-portrait (first column,
middle picture) and the life painting beneath it. The
other paintings are tighter
in execution, trying out different styles, as one
might expect from a beginner
painter. Charles
Thomson's studio Charles Thomson included her
work in the exhibiton. He
says, "I thought she had potential but it wasn't
being realised in her work,
which lacked imagination. I noticed she was
continually doodling in her diary
various scenes from strip clubs or hostess bars. There
was an aliveness and startling
frankness and inventivess about these doodles. I told
her that she should be making
these the basis of her painting, that she should let
her real emotions guide her
imagery, have faith in her own thoughts and be true to
her life experiences -
in other words the philosophy that is embodied in the
Stuckist manifestos." The
doodle above is typical of many that Vine passed away
time with. Thomson pointed
out the artistic potential of such spontaneity, and
her work was transformed.
Her drawings (recorded in his sketches of her) clearly
show the shift that has
occurred within less than a month. The
first drawing shows her sketchbook with a scene from a
strip club, along the lines
of her doodles. The next is a stripper and a
masturbating priest - suddenly life
experiences and her reactions to them become the pivot
of her expression. The
third is a portrait from memory of Billy Childish
performing at the private view
at the Fridge Gallery six weeks earlier. Its emotional
power contrasts dramatically
with the reserved faces she had previously painted,
and led in time to the angst-drenched
portrait of Princess Diana. Her
first two paintings in the new mode were done in
Thomson's studio at his then
home in Finchley. He provided technical advice on the
process of oil painting,
and also discussed aspects of colour, composition and
paint handling, whilst working
alongside her. The
first one showed a strip club customer with a stiletto
heel being ground into
his forehead. The second, with a provisional title of
The Great Whore of London
was in a pose which Thomson later used in his own
painting Stripper,
shown above. back
to top
|
CORRECTIONS
TO MEDIA REPORTS
"SHE HAD NEVER SOLD A PAINTING BEFORE"
It was widely reported that Stella Vine had
never sold a painting before. This may be true, but it is a disingenuous
statement.
- Stella Vine had never
sold a painting before but not for lack of
interest
- She
had never sold a painting because she refused
to
- In
2001 she had the offer of all her work being bought
regularly so she could
live off it and support herself
- She
turned down this
offer and preferred to go back to stripping for a
living
Charles Thomson, the co-founder
of Stuckism and then married to her (they were living in their
own homes), made this offer to her (and recorded it in his diary
on 27 September 2001). She said she wanted to keep her work for
a one-woman show. He said in that case he would retain it until
such a show and they would share the profits of any subsequent
sales. She said no.
"NOBODY LIKED WHAT SHE WAS DOING OR BELIEVED IN HER"
Vine has said, "I didn't think anyone else
would believe in me."
The following occured specifically through her association
with the Stuckists (May-November 2001).....
- Her
work was exhibited for the first time - in the
Vote Stuckist show at the Fridge
Gallery, Brixton (31 May - 28 June 2001).
- She
was invited to join the Stuckists and found a
group which she did (the Westminster
Stuckists, listed on the site 12.6.01, renamed The
Unstuckists 10.7.01. See below).
-
She wrote, "Rafelle... said
he liked my pictures, this is a first !!!!!!"
(email, 27 June 2001)
-
She said , "Thanks for all
the encouragement with the painting,and
i really enjoyed being with you in the galleries
etc…….You are an incredible person.I
am shell shocked by everything that has happened."
(email to Charles Thomson,
1 July 2001)
- She
was also encouraged by other Stuckist artists eg
Philip Absolon who
gave her one of his life
drawings
- Her
name appeared in the press for the first
time
- as a Stuckist artist - in the Evening Standard
(20.8.01), with her endorsement,
in a story about her marriage.
- She
was interviewed by Now TV arts channel
(though this was not broadcast)
- She
was being filmed for a BBC2 documentary about her
marriage (left unfinished
because the marriage ended)
- She
was invited to promote her work by Charles Thomson
alongside his as an 'art
couple'. She accepted and he paid off her debts to
give her the freedom to pursue
her art.
- She
had her first solo show at the Rivington Gallery
(one afternoon only by invite
during her wedding reception)
- She
was one of the selected artists for the Addaction
charity show at Panter &
Hall Gallery, Mayfair
(11.9.01)
- She
was exhibited internationally in the Paris Stuckist show, Musee d'Adzac, curated by Elsa Dax, Paris Stuckists (19 Oct - 16 Nov
2001). Photo of the show
- She
was one of the two featured artists for the Stuckists
Real Turner Prize Show 2001
at the Rivington Gallery, Shoreditch (she withdrew
shortly before the show was
hung, but not before her name had appeared in print in
some listings, including
What's On In London) in preference to more
established artists.
The decision to dissasociate herself from the Stuckists and this
promotion of her was entirely her own.
"SHE DIDN'T
AGREE WITH STUCKIST VIEWS"
The Daily Telegraph reported "she claims she
never shared his [Charles Thomson's Stuckist] views".
- She attended a talk on Stuckism
on 20 June 2000 by Billy Childish and Charles Thomson,
at the Salon des Arts, Kensington (photos here), so she was fully aware of the anti-conceptual art stance
of the Stuckists. The talk was promoted by the Institute of
Ideas.
- She founded the Westminster Stuckists
group in May 2001. She was invited to do this on at the
private view of the Vote Stuckist show (30.5.01). Web archives
on Stuckism: home page shows Westminster Stuckists listed on 12.6.01.
Groups page lists her as the founder. News page records renaming of Westminster Stuckists to The
Unstuckists (10.7.01). Theunstuckists.com domain name registered here.
- She took part in the Stuckist
demonstration against Rachel Whiteread's Plinth in Trafalgar
Square 4 June 2001. Getty Images photo
and with SP Howarth photo.
- She was a helper for the Stuckist
Party, General Election (7.6.01) when
Charles Thomson stood on an anti-Britart ticket against the
then Culture Minister, Chris Smith in Islington South.
- She said Tracey Emin's work lacked 'vision,
generosity and compassion' (Charles Thomson, diary 2.7.01)
- She said Billy Childish had
"a huge impact on my life, and for that I am truly
grateful" web blogspot (24.2.04)
- Billy Childish (now ex-) Stuckist co-founder said, "Me and Charles's
views on art are pretty much the same views, regardless
of any stylistic differences.The only thing I really disagreed
with Charles on was his marketing ideas." (March 2004)
"SHE HAD NO TRAINING APART FROM SOME PART-TIME LOCAL
CLASSES "
In the press and on TV interviews she has acknowledged
only some painting classes at Hampstead School of Art as her art
foundation. Her art actually had far stronger influences in its
formation from being involved with Stuckist artists:.
- HER PAINTING STYLE WAS MODELLED
ON BILLY CHILDISH
- Billy Childish's work and example was the model and inspiration
for her to paint (she also bought a guitar and an old
valve amplifier based on his ideas on music)
- She bought two paintings by Billy Childish in June 2001 specifically
as an inspiration for her work
- The influence of his painting style
is still clearly evident in her current work - vigorous, expressive and often crude brush work
- Her colour range stays within similar
parameters to his
- She also works quickly as he does - both artists have managed to complete
a painting in fifteen minutes - (Childish's explanation for
this is that it releases unconscious material)
- She visited Billy Childish's studio in Whitstable on 26 August 2001.
- HER IDEAS WERE TRANSFORMED BY CHARLES THOMSON
- She was painting standard portrait heads at Hampstead School
of Art when she met Charles Thomson in 2001
- Charles Thomson tutored her and gave her new ideas based on
the Stuckist approach to art - to open up to her emotions
and make an uncensored direct expression of her experiences
- She worked alongside him in his studio,
where he advised her on composition, colour and technique
as she painted
- She said to him, "Thanks for all
the encouragement with the painting, and i really enjoyed being with you in the galleries etc…….You
are an incredible person.I am shell shocked by everything
that has happened." (Email 1 July 2001)
- Her art took a radically new direction
as a result
- This is the direction she is continuing to follow with her
current work with "real art that looks at the world around us...
it's not all flowers and boxes of chocolates" (Stella
Vine, BBC Radio 4, Front Row 16.3.04).
- SP Howarth: "She went from these really ordinary
portraits, and when Charles tutored her, they leapt forward
and became something quite dynamic and exciting. 'Swinging from the Chandeliers' was a very
good painting - in such a short time, she'd tapped into a
much rawer nerve." SP (Stephen) Howarth, artist, poet and
friend of the couple at the time. Stella was sufficiently
impressed by SP's art to buy a painting from him.
- Billy Childish: "Charlie
was very keen for Stella to develop her style and to exhibit....
to encourage her to do her her paintings - to say 'this is
worth doing and you should do it'... She really liked
my stuff and Charlie certainly encouraged her to express herself
more openly... I'm glad she gets inspiration from my work
and ideas, and appreciate her acknowledging that.
- Dan Paterson: "Stella said that Charles was helping
her with her art - developing her style - coaching her - not
exactly those words but words to that effect. She did
seem happy when she said this, and seemed perfectly relaxed
to be with Charles. A painting which she had apparently just
finished was propped up against the wall of Charles' studio,
near one of his half-finished Gainsborough transcriptions."
Dan Paterson, art agent, met Thomson and Vine in 2001 in Thomson's
studio.
|
back
to top |